I want to thank the House Resources Committee for giving me the opportunity to say a few words about the ecological effects of mining in the anthracite region, which is actually a rather complex topic.
I'll try to hit the high points from the 10 page essay that I provided as written testimony. Also, I apologize for getting the date wrong on the original draft.
Ecologically, mining has left a profound environmental impact on northeastern Pennsylvania, and indeed one of the reasons that I chose to become an ecologist back in the 1970s was to help solve those problems.
To be fair to mine operators, most of the mining-related damage occurred before laws protecting the environment were enacted, and before the value of natural ecosystems was realized.
As I note in my essay, impacts of mining have affected both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, covering about 100,000 acres. In general, the ecological impacts of mining have been to reduce biological diversity and a number of ecological functions and values like productivity, water purification, erosion control, and sustainability.
Most of the damage to terrestrial systems has been caused by the deposition of a stony substrate that is infertile, has high concentrations of toxic minerals like iron and aluminum, has high acidity, and is poor at holding onto water. During warm summer days, strip mine substrates can exceed 150oF, like an asphalt parking lot.
As a result of those stressful conditions, plants have a difficult time revegetating mined sites. Normally we see a sparse community of scrubby species like gray birch, trembling aspen, blackberry, and spotted knapweed. Likewise, animal species are also relatively sparse because of lack of water and not enough food. Culm backs also create water pollution because they allow rainwater to infiltrate and mix with acid-bearing rocks.
Anthracite mining has also devastated thousands of acres of lakes, creeks, and wetlands, which are critical habitats. Large-scale earthmoving and deposition of mine spoil obliterated wetlands, lakes, and creekbeds. In many cases, creekbeds were either rerouted, or their paths were blocked, forcing water down into the mines. As a result, headwaters that contain clean water and otherwise high quality ecosystems are isolated from lower reaches of the watershed, which serves to reduce populations in the headwater areas.
Mining also causes an impact on water quality due to acid mine drainage. AMD is characterized by high levels of iron or aluminum that precipitate in the water and coat the bottom of the channel. Accumulated iron especially kills aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates alike, resulting in a dead stream. Recent studies on AMD-impacted creeks by some of my Wilkes students showed those creeks to be essentially dead.
Ecological degradation caused by mining can be fixed, to a large extent. Terrestrial systems are typically improved by regrading the site, and adding fertilizer and seed. That leads to a meadow-like condition. While certainly better than having culm bank, I have misgivings about that method, and think that a more sustainable smart reclamation approach, emphasizing reforestation with native species, needs to be instituted.
In terms of addressing aquatic pollution, we can do a variety of things that actually have a synergistic effect. First, we need to actively restore degraded stream channels, making them look and function as natural as possible. It is important to keep water on the surface and allow a good corridor to develop between headwaters and main rivers. Second, acid mine drainage can be addressed by passive techniques like wetlands. I was involved in a couple of wetland projects near Wilkes-Barre. The second began functioning last spring, and is now 97% efficient, removing 300 lbs of iron per day.
It is important that reclamation efforts done in a holistic fashion. While individual projects are important, having an integrated strategy whereby smart terrestrial reclamation is linked with sound ecologically-based aquatic reclamation will ensure the success of the entire process.
In a way, I think that its unfortunate that in the year 2000, we are still talking about fixing the environmental impact of mining. However, the reality is that to effect good reclamation, hundreds of millions of dollars will be needed to carry out the needed assessments and designs, to put people on bulldozers, and to import the materials needed to make things work properly. If we don't, nature will fix itself, but I estimate that it will take 300-500 years for wounds to heal. Condemning this region to the current level of devastation for that period of time would be terrible public policy. We have the know-how and the will, we just need the resources. We can and must do better, and hope this committee can help.
The extraction and processing of anthracite coal caused an
enormous environmental impact to nearly 100,000 acres of terrestrial
and aquatic habitat throughout northeastern and east-central
Pennsylvania. Original terrestrial forests were destroyed by strip
mining and the deposition of culm material. Due to those activities,
thousands of acres are marred by steep slopes and coarse substrates
characterized by low fertility, toxic levels of certain elements,
extreme drought, and high summertime temperatures. Natural
revegetation has proceeded slowly on mine-impacted sites, resulting
in sparse communities of low-value scrubby species. Ecological
productivity, biological diversity, and recreation values are
substantially lower on mined sites than on forested unmined areas.
Animal life is also impaired due to insufficient food and water, and
to extreme physical conditions.
Anthracite mining has also damaged aquatic communities like streams
and wetlands. Mining caused physical loss to stream channel habitat
and created acid mine drainage (AMD). Mining often isolates headwater
streams from lower reaches in the watershed, leading to losses of
biological diversity and productivity. The loss of wetlands by mining
exacerbates downstream flooding, degrades the capacity for natural
water filtration, and reduces biological diversity among
wetland-dependent species. Millions of gallons of AMD enters
waterways throughout the region, causing concentrations of dissolved
iron, aluminum, and sulfate to exceed the tolerances of aquatic
species. That AMD flows into major rivers like the Susquehanna and
Lackawanna, contributing thousands of pounds of iron per day that
coats the bed and migrates toward the Chesapeake Bay.
Corrective measures can be taken to address the ecological damage of
mining. The methodologies employed are improving thanks to new
research findings. Terrestrial reclamation typically involves
regrading and fertilizing the site, and adding a mix of plant seeds,
usually of grasses and legumes. The result is a meadow-like community
that prevents erosion and can be used as pasture. However, that
approach may prevent the formation of natural forests and may not be
sustainable in the long run. A new reclamation paradigm may be needed
to tailor restoration to the ultimate use of the site, and to
encourage native woody species on those sites targeted for
greenspace.
Mining-related damage to aquatic communities can also be corrected.
Stream channels should be restored following newly developed
ecological approaches that keep water on the surface, maximize
biological diversity, and provide a continuous corridor connecting
headwaters to major rivers. AMD can be ameliorated by use of passive
approaches (wetlands, anoxic limestone drains) and by preventing its
formation through stream channel restoration, reclamation of culm
banks, and possibly injecting materials like fly ash into underground
mine voids.
Solving the environmental problems of mining will require the
collaboration of federal and state agency officials, scientists, and
the private sector. Sufficient funding will be needed to pay for the
expertise, labor, and materials needed to develop and execute a
successful plan. The American Heritage River initiative should play a
central role in coordinating the effort and securing funding.
Over the past 150 years, large parts of northeastern and
east-central Pennsylvania have been affected by mining for anthracite
coal. Mining practices have profoundly influenced the economy, social
structure, politics, physical landscape, and natural ecology of the
affected regions. My testimony given in this essay will largely focus
on the environmental impacts, including the effect on the landscape
and ecological relationships. Economic and social impacts will be
mentioned only briefly. Comments about restoration strategies and
needs will be provided at the end.
Understanding the impacts of coal mining requires a general knowledge
of the geologic history of eastern Pennsylvania. Virtually all of the
bedrock of northeastern and east-central Pennsylvania originated
300-360 million years ago, when the state was covered by a huge sea.
Fine rock particles settled and formed sedimentary deposits of
sandstone and shale. However, certain areas were dominated by swamp
forests. Individual plants did not decompose when they died, but
instead they underwent a chemical change, forming vast coal deposits.
Those deposits became buried by additional sedimentation, often
forming alternating layers of coal and non-coal sedimentary rock. The
coal forming process was most prevalent in certain parts of eastern
Pennsylvania, forming four major coal fields separated by areas that
lack anthracite.
Subsequently, a series of geologic events involving mountain
formation, erosion, and glaciation produced the current
ridge-and-valley topography of the region. Following the recession of
the most recent glacier 12,000 years ago, eastern Pennsylvania became
vegetated by a lush forest composed of evergreens like white pine and
hemlock, and by hardwoods like oaks, chestnut, birch, maple, and ash.
Beginning 250 years ago, the original forest was cleared for timber
and agriculture by white settlers. Thousands of acres remain in
agriculture or have become urbanized. However, large areas have
reverted back to natural forest. Such lands are ecologically sound,
supporting diverse, productive terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
Our forests are valuable for recreation, timber management, and
watershed uses.
Vast areas of eastern Pennsylvania underlain by anthracite
deposits were greatly influenced by the extraction and processing of
coal during the past 150 years. The US Department of Agriculture
lists approximately 51,000 acres (ca. 80 square miles) of soils as
being mine-impacted in Luzerne and Lackawanna counties alone.
Information from the Bureau of Abandoned Mineland Reclamation of the
Department of Environmental Protection places the extent of impact at
98,000 acres.
The successful removal of coal required that it be extracted from
intervening layers of sandstone and shale. Historically, two methods
were used to extract coal: underground mining and strip (surface)
mining. Underground mining typically followed seams of coal downward,
producing vertical shafts and horizontally arranged tunnels that
often extended for miles. In contrast, strip mining involved the use
of large shovels and draglines to physically remove the overburden,
thus exposing the coal seams. Once removed, the raw coal was
separated from energy-poor culm material having high
concentrations of silica, iron, and sulfur.
Regardless of the extraction method, anthracite mining has had huge
environmental effects that can be classified in several ways. First,
one can distinguish between aboveground and belowground effects.
Second, mining caused physical damage to the landscape, as well as
impacts to the original flora and fauna. Finally, the environmental
effects can also be classified by effects on terrestrial vs aquatic
ecosystems, though in many instances the former contributes to the
latter.
Because most of the activity was well below the surface, the actual
removal of coal by underground mining did not have much environmental
effect. As will be noted later, however, it did produce secondary
effects, especially to water quality. In contrast, strip mining has
had a profound impact on the local terrain because of the creation of
huge depressions (stripping pits), nearly vertical highwalls, and
high mounds of accumulated overburden material.
Whether removed by underground or strip mining, purifying the
anthracite created additional impacts on the landscape. One type of
impact involved the creation of mounds of coal waste in the form of
culm banks (also called gob or bony). Such banks typically contain
rock fragments often 0.5-2 in diameter that are rich in carbon,
iron, and sulfur. Some of the larger banks are 200 high and
occupy hundreds of acres.
Preparation of coal for market also involved washing, breaking, and
sorting coal pieces of various sizes. That process resulted in the
creation of small coal fragments, often less than 0.5 in
diameter, having low commercial value. Those fine coal fragments were
separated from the larger, more valuable pieces of coal by settling,
creating deposits of mine wash that were allowed to
develop in sedimentation basins. Mine wash was often removed from the
basins and spread over adjoining areas. In other instances, mine wash
particles were carried downstream as wash water was released from
impoundments.
Thus, the mining process left a significant percentage of
northeastern Pennsylvania covered by gaping pits, huge mounds of
coarse material, and sterile deposits of mine wash. The mining
process created profound disruptions to the natural ecosystems in
which they occurred. As noted, the ecological effects have both
terrestrial and aquatic components.
Anthracite mining has devastated tens of thousands of acres of
terrestrial ecosystems in eastern Pennsylvania. Strip mining
especially caused the removal of the original vegetation and all
soils on the site. The result was a barren landscape covered by a
coarse substrate, often with steep slopes. In some cases, those culm
banks caught fire, producing even more hazardous and stressful
conditions. Unlike unmined sites that can recover relatively quickly
after clearing, revegetation on strip mined sites occurs slowly. It
is not uncommon to see 50-80 year old culm banks that are essentially
barren.
A combination of physical and biological factors interact to restrict
the rate of natural revegetation on abandoned anthracite mines.
Severe substrate conditions are perhaps the greatest problem, on both
burned and unburned areas. Studies conducted over the past several
decades have documented that sites underlain by culm, ash, and
mine-wash have low concentrations of important nutrients like
nitrate, phosphate, calcium, and potassium. Moreover, they often have
toxic levels of iron and aluminum. The coarse substrate on culm banks
does not retain water, resulting in drought-prone conditions that
often rival the most severe deserts on the planet. The black
substrate also absorbs solar energy and converts it to heat,resulting
in summertime surface temperatures that exceed 150oF.
A variety on biological factors also limit revegetation on mined
sites, and these act in subtle ways that are still being discovered
by ongoing research. Certainly, fresh culm and mine-wash lack seeds
or rootstocks that would serve as a source of new plants. Instead,
vegetation development must depend on the fortuitous immigration of
seeds from plants growing off-site. In the case of large culm banks,
the nearest source of seeds might be a quarter of a mile away.
Moreover, those seeds must successfully germinate and produce
established seedlings, which is difficult in the highly unfavorable
thermal, chemical, and moisture environments of culm and mine
wash.
Research conducted in the past several decades has shown that
mine-derived soils lack a healthy population of soil microbes,
including fungi, bacteria, and invertebrates. Plants on strip mines
cannot form associations with certain soil fungi that normally serve
as a feeder system for critical nutrients and water. Moreover, the
lack of fungi and many types of bacteria and invertebrates prevent
normal recycling of nutrients within the soil, further impairing
fertility.
The vegetation that does develop on mined sites in eastern
Pennsylvania is very different from that on unmined sites. Culm banks
especially bear a mix of scrubby growth having much lower stature
than more favorable off-mine sites. Mineland vegetation rarely
exceeds thirty feet in height, in sharp contrast to maturing forests
that often exceed 100. Species composition is also rather
distinctive in that the dominant woody species on mined sites include
invasive species that have low commercial value like gray birch,
black locust, and trembling aspen. More valuable oaks, maples,
hickories, ashes, and hemlocks are rare on mined sites. The
understory of mined sites is also rather poorly developed, being
composed of prickly shrubs like tall blackberry and multiflora rose,
as well as weedy, alien herbs like spotted knapweed, switchgrass, and
white sweet clover.
Functionally, the vegetation that develops on mined sites has several
characteristics that are indicative of an unhealthy system. First,
the level of species diversity is lower than that of unmined sites,
making mineland vegetation relatively unstable. Second, the
vegetation has low level of productivity, measured by the relative
inability to capture energy and pass it to higher trophic levels.
Third, the vegetation is composed of species that cannot generally
reproduce in its own shade, and thus may not be sustainable. Fourth,
the stressful physical conditions on mined sites make the component
species more susceptible to disease. For example, trembling aspen
trees on stressful sites are often damaged by hypoxylon canker while
those on unstressed sites resist that fungal disease. Finally,
mineland woods do not provide much soil stabilization, oxygen
production, or water purification, which are important functions
normally associated with natural forested ecosystems.
Animal populations, including both game and non-game species, are
also severely restricted on mined sites. The scrubby vegetation
characterized by high densities of prickly shrubs, confers poor
habitat for species normally accustomed to shaded or grassland
conditions in Pennsylvania. Also, the lack of moisture and extreme
thermal conditions excludes most species except for a few snakes,
spiders, and tolerant insect species. Mine-land vegetation is often
unpalatable and has relatively low nutritive value for grazing
animals.
Mining has had a profound impact on aquatic ecosystems like
wetlands, creeks, and lakes of northeastern Pennsylvania. Such
ecosystems are extremely valuable from both ecological and
recreational perspectives. Communities that develop in aquatic
ecosystems are typically composed of microscopic species, larger
invertebrates like caddisflies and stoneflies, and vertebrates like
fish and amphibians. Those organisms interact in complex ways, and
play crucial roles in nutrient turnover and energy processing. An
important property of aquatic ecosystems is that they are
interconnected by the flow of water downstream. Thus, energy and
nutrients received by small creeks and wetlands high in the watershed
are often used by populations of commercially important finfish and
shellfish in downstream rivers and estuaries.
Effects of mining on aquatic resources are both physical and chemical
in nature. Most of earthmoving activities of mining occurred well
before the enactment of laws designed to protect aquatic resources -
particularly the 1977 Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Strip
mining and the deposition of culm material occurred without any
regard to wetlands, watercourses, and other waterbodies. Thus, miles
of stream channel habitat and many hundreds of acres of wetland in
the anthracite areas have been destroyed by indiscriminate digging
and filling. One prime example of such destruction can be seen in the
Nanticoke Creek corridor in central Luzerne County. There, the normal
course of water that drains the unmined upper slopes of Wilkes-Barre
Mountain is blocked by a huge culm bank complex near Warrior Run. As
a result, the headwaters of Nanticoke Creek are completely isolated
from the lower reaches of that creek, and ultimately the Susquehanna
River. Results from preliminary studies indicate that biological
diversity and food chain support are lower than expected in the
Nanticoke Creek headwaters, compared to similar creeks that are
directly connected to lower reaches of their watershed.
In many places where streams flow through mine impacted areas, the
fractured bedrock allows surface streamflow to seep underground. That
loss of water is directly opposite to the typical gain in flow as one
proceeds to lower positions in watersheds not impacted by mining. As
will be noted shortly, that lost water is only
temporarily hidden from view. Instead, the water resurfaces further
down the watershed, often in a highly contaminated form.
Even if not completely obliterated, stream channels are often altered
and degraded on mined sites. Studies of stream channel morphology on
mined sites show that creeks there have unusually steep banks
composed of unstable material. That morphology is highly unfavorable
during floods because it causes unacceptably high levels of erosion,
and because it often exacerbates downstream flooding. Siltation of
creeks lower in the watershed is especially problematic because many
valuable stream invertebrate species cannot tolerate sediment
deposition.
The loss of wetlands in mined areas is another source of concern.
Wetlands have many environmental benefits and enjoy the protection of
federal and state laws. Wetland soils are typically porous and absorb
water during periods of heavy precipitation, therefore reducing the
severity of downstream flooding. Wetlands also act as excellent
natural water purifiers because they trap suspended sediments and
remove dissolved pollutants like nitrates, phosphates, and heavy
metals. Wetlands also provide habitat to plants and animals. In that
context, wetlands serve as spawning and rearing sites for fish and
amphibians, breeding locations for many birds, and locations for food
chain support for dozens of mammal species. The loss of wetlands due
to mining activities has led to dirtier water downstream, exacerbated
flooding in some cases, and a regional loss of biological diversity
and ecological productivity.
Concurrent with the loss of healthy aquatic habitat, mining has
created two types of unproductive open-water conditions:
stripping-pit pools and sedimentation lagoons. The former are bodies
of open water that develop in strip mine operations, where the
excavated pit intercepts the prevailing water table. These
inadvertent, artificial lakes are characterized by steep walls and
depths that exceed 30. Aside from the inherent danger that they
pose, stripping-pit pools have low ecological productivity because
they are typically isolated from other aquatic habitats, and because
their water often contains pollutants that cannot support life.
Sedimentation lagoons are natural or artificial bodies of water that
are found near old mining operations. They functioned as settling
basins to clarify water used to wash coal. As a result, the substrate
of such lagoons is composed of deposits of fine-grained mine-wash.
Such deposits are infertile and often contain high concentrations of
toxic elements. Therefore, sedimentation lagoons are typically
lifeless, save a few very hardy species of low ecological value.
Perhaps the best known effect of mining on aquatic ecosystems comes
in the form of acid mine drainage (AMD). AMD is characterized by the
presence of inorganic elements like iron, manganese, aluminum, and
sulfates that are carried by water discharging from culm banks or
mine voids. The chemistry of AMD has been well studied, especially in
the bituminous coal fields of western Pennsylvania and southern
Appalachia. The AMD problem in the anthracite fields has received
some attention between 1940 and 1985, but work done in the 1990s has
both increased our understanding of the pattern of AMD effects and
trends in water quality over the last 40 years.
AMD forms when water intercepts underground pyrite or
aluminum-bearing deposits, and leaches harmful substances from those
deposits. In some cases, AMD is generated when rainwater or snowmelt
enters into culm banks, and dissolves the iron-rich coal waste
material. In other cases, AMD forms when the water table contacts
residual pyrite in underground mine workings, and then flows to the
surface. AMD normally enters creeks in two ways. The first is in the
form of seeps that often discharge from the bases of culm banks. Such
seeps are rarely exceed 50 gallons per minute, but often contain high
concentrations of dissolved metals and sulfates. The second is in the
form of deep mine outfalls that often spew thousands of gallons of
mine water per minute into receiving waterbodies. Such outfalls exist
at the points of old mine shafts or ventilation holes, but some are
actually boreholes that were intentionally excavated to relieve
underground flooding. Some of the worst mine outfalls in the
anthracite region include the Jeddo mine tunnel northwest of
Hazleton, the old Newport Dump west of Nanticoke, the Solomons
Creek boreholes south of Wilkes-Barre, the Butler mine tunnel in
Pittston, and the Old Forge discharge south of Scranton.
AMD impairs the ecological productivity in receiving waterbodies in
several ways. First, the dissolved iron undergoes a series of
chemical reactions that lead to the formation of insoluble iron
hydroxide, which is really liquid rust. Iron hydroxide particles
coagulate in the water, staining the water bright orange. Over time,
those particles settle onto the creekbed forming deposits known as
yellow boy. The cloudy water and accumulated deposits
create conditions harmful to all forms of aquatic life. Indeed,
studies recently done in the southern Wyoming Valley indicate that
AMD-impacted streams are completely devoid of invertebrates and fish
life. In the middle and southern anthracite fields, dissolved
aluminum and low pH conditions typify the AMD problems. Dissolved
aluminum presents a problem to aquatic animals because it collects on
gills, thus rendering them incapable of gas exchange. Low pH levels,
indicative of high acidity loads, also impair the functioning of all
forms of life because they disrupt normal cellular metabolism.
Because it enters into creeks and streams, AMD is normally carried
downstream to receiving rivers, thus impairing their function. In the
northern anthracite field of the Wyoming and Lackawanna Valleys, AMD
is ultimately received by the Susquehanna and Lackawanna Rivers. The
effect of AMD on the Susquehanna-Lackawanna complex is really unknown
and deserves intensive study. Spot analyses indicate that water
quality in those rivers is at least impaired at points of entry and
for some distance downstream. Indications of that impairment are
obvious at the discharge of the Old Forge borehole into the
Lackawanna River, the confluence of the Lackawanna and Susquehanna
Rivers, and where Solomons Creek, Nanticoke Creek, and Newport
Creek all enter the Susquehanna. At those places, the riverbed is
heavily stained by deposits of iron hydroxide. The nature of
accumulation of those iron deposits, and their transport downriver
are unknown and need further investigation. Moreover, the effects of
mine drainage on invertebrates and fish in the river are also
unknown. While numerous species of both types of aquatic life are
found, biodiversity and productivity are probably both impaired to
some degree by discharges of contaminated mine water from outfalls
and creeks that receive AMD.
As with most problems, the environmental degradation caused by
mining can be rectified. One can classify such remedies by whether
they fix terrestrial vs aquatic ecosystems. Many approaches to fixing
mining-related problems are based on straightforward methods that are
decades old. However, novel approaches have been developed within the
past twenty years, largely drawing from the new discipline of
Restoration Ecology. Those new approaches have been used to a limited
degree in remedying environmental problems within the anthracite
region. Much more can be done to implement that new knowledge and to
discover even better approaches in the future.
In terms of terrestrial ecosystems, successful restoration depends
upon improving the physical environment and introducing plant stock
to enhance the rate at which vegetation can develop. Improving the
physical environment for plant growth typically involves regrading
the disturbed landscape to eliminate highly erodable steep slopes,
and improving the soil by the adding fertilizers and organic mulch.
Plant stock is usually added by seeding the area with species
tolerant of reclaimed mine sites, and able to form a dense vegetative
cover quickly.
When they are implemented, mine reclamation practices generally
follow the guidelines given in the 1977 Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act (SMCRA). In essence, that legislation mandates that
mine reclamation is accomplished when the mined site is regraded to a
topographic contour that approximates the original conditions, and a
dense cover of vegetation is established. Reclamation specialists
satisfy the requirements of SMCRA by first bulldozing the disturbed
area to a smooth contour having uniform grades. A fertilizer
containing nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and lime is then added.
Finally, the area is seeded, typically by a grass-legume mix. Those
practices usually create a meadow-like stand of vegetation that
protects against erosion and can even by used as pastureland.
Because the environmental damage caused by mining in the anthracite
region occurred long before the implementation of SMCRA, reclamation
is mostly conducted by governmental agencies. The most active agency
involved in mine reclamation is the Bureau of Abandoned Mine
Reclamation (BAMR), of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP). In the northern anthracite field, the Earth
Conservancy (EC) is also engaged in reclamation efforts on its land
holdings.
While the efforts to reclaim mine lands according the SMCRA
guidelines do improve their ecological productivity, some concern has
been expressed over the long-term effects of current reclamation
practices. Specifically, the grass-legume mixture introduced as a
vegetative cover is viewed as being artificial because it uses alien
species not really belonging to the native flora of Pennsylvania.
Also, the meadow-like vegetation may actually hamper the development
of a forest community that is normal for eastern Pennsylvania. In
short, reclaimed sites may remain in an arrested state of ecological
development, and might not be sustainable over the course of decades.
As an alternative, some restoration ecologists are calling for an
alternate smart reclamation strategy that involves
rough-grading the site, and introducing native species that will
ultimately be consistent with the development of forest conditions.
The feasibility of using that smart approach to reclaim
abandoned mined sites in the anthracite region deserves to be
explored.
Efforts to reclaim impaired aquatic habitats have also been conducted
in the anthracite area, but the practices employed are evolving as
new knowledge becomes available. Restoration of aquatic habitats is
aimed at promoting healthy streams, lakes, and wetlands with high
ecological productivity and biological diversity. To accomplish that
goal, attention must be devoted to restoring the both the physical
conditions and chemical makeup of local waterways.
Historically, addressing chemical contamination in the form of acid
mine drainage often meant adding additional chemicals, such as lime
or caustic soda. The aim was to neutralize the acidity and quickly
precipitate the heavy metals. While generally effective, adding
neutralizing chemicals to AMD can be costly and dangerous.
During the past fifteen years, passive approaches to addressing AMD
have been developed. Such approaches involve technologies such as the
use of constructed wetlands, anoxic limestone drains, and sequential
alkalinity producing systems (SAPS). Often, those technologies are
combined in a given project. The goal is to raise the level of
alkalinity of the water and promote the oxidation and removal of
heavy metals, particularly iron, manganese, and aluminum, in a
controlled location.
One of the first AMD-treatment wetlands in the anthracite region was
constructed by the Earth Conservancy in Hanover Township, Luzerne
County. Completed in 1996, it treats a large seep that enters into
Espy Run, a tributary of Nanticoke Creek. Based upon the success of
that wetland, the EC constructed a 2.2 acre wetland to treat mine
water discharging from the Dundee Outfall, 0.7 miles from the
original wetland. That second wetland utilizes a novel water aeration
system to promote iron oxidation, and began working in May 1999.
Analyses of that systems performance indicate that it removes
over 95% of the iron in the water, exceeding 300 lbs per day.
Further implementation of constructed wetland technology is possible.
However, it should not be viewed as the total solution to the AMD
problem, largely because not enough land is available for wetland
construction. Instead, fixing the AMD problem will probably require
the elimination of root causes of mine drainage. In one sense, the
removal of culm banks and the implementation of sound reclamation
techniques in terrestrial mine-impacted sites should reduce the
infiltration of rainwater and snowmelt into pyrite-bearing rock
strata. Second, mine voids can be filled with various materials like
fly ash, as done in West Virginia. Filling mine voids reduces the
flow of mine water from normal discharge points, but should be used
with care, especially if done in populated or industrial areas.
A third, highly promising approach to eliminating the formation of
AMD is to restore normal creekbed conditions in abandoned minelands.
Because many creeks in minelands often lose water to underground mine
pools making them impermeable to water loss is an attractive option.
The idea of lining creekbeds with impermeable material is not
entirely new. Indeed, coal companies often enclosed watercourses in
flumes to prevent seepage into inactive mines. However, such
structures often deteriorated and failed over time. The confinement
of watercourses in smooth-walled flumes also prevents a productive
aquatic community from forming.
Within the past ten years, new techniques have been developed to
restore stream channels following ecologically sound principles.
First, channels are constructed to mimic the horizontal morphology of
natural watercourses, specifically by using a channel within a
channel design. That morphology allows the channel to
accommodate wide ranges of flow conditions from low volume baseflows
to periodic floods. Second, the new designs provide for the
development of pools and riffles that create the diversity of
habitats needed by the array of invertebrates and vertebrates found
in healthy aquatic ecosystems. Third, the materials used to form the
bed and banks of newly restored stream channels are selected to mimic
natural conditions and promote high levels of biological diversity.
For example, new approaches abandon the use of conventional rip-rap
and concrete in favor of bioengineering materials like
layered shrubs and carefully oriented tree trunks. Finally, wooded
buffer zones are placed along the sides of creeks because they
provide both organic matter to feed aquatic invertebrates, as well as
shade in reducing extreme summertime temperatures.
The result of a successful stream restoration effort has the dual
benefit of keeping otherwise clean water on the surface, thus
preventing the formation of AMD, and providing a biologically rich
corridor that effectively links headwaters to lower reaches of the
watershed. A well designed stream corridor also has recreational
benefits for hiking, mountain biking, and horseback riding.
To date, a ecological stream restoration effort has been conducted
near Hazleton by BAMR. A proposal to develop an even more
comprehensive restoration effort along the Nanticoke Creek headwaters
in central Luzerne County has been submitted by the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Clearly, however, many miles of degraded streams and other
aquatic habitats exist in the anthracite region, and deserve to be
restored.
Two centuries of anthracite mining have severely degraded the
ecological conditions in large portions of eastern Pennsylvania. Most
of the impact has been to terrestrial ecosystems, in that the
excavation of stripping pits and the deposition of culm banks have
converted an otherwise healthy forest ecosystem into a barren
landscape, vegetated by a sparse scrubland of low-value, often
non-native, species. The regions aquatic resources in the form
of streams, lakes, and wetlands, have also been greatly degraded by
mining. Some of the destruction has been in the form of losses to
original bodies of water. Other degradation is in the form of the
discharge of millions of gallons of acid mine drainage each day into
local creeks, and ultimately into major waterbodies like the
Susquehanna and Lackawanna Rivers. As a result, the creeks are
biologically dead, and the Susquehanna-Lackawanna complex shows
impairment. The mining problems are interconnected in that AMD is
caused by precipitation infiltrating through culm banks, by losses of
streamflow in regions of degraded watercourses, and by the contact of
groundwater with residual pyrite deposits in underground mine
voids.
Aside from inherent losses to biological productivity and
biodiversity, the damage inflicted by past mining has both
sociopolitical and economic liabilities. Mined sites are viewed as
being wastelands, and their drab dark-gray appearance contributes to
a general feeling of despair and negativity felt by many residents.
The presence of culm banks, huge stripping pits, and streams colored
orange by mine drainage detracts from a sense of community pride and
a land ethic. Indeed, as a building with a broken window invites
further vandalism, mine lands often receive the brunt of illegal
dumping by local residents.
In economic terms, abandoned mine lands have direct costs in that
they are unproductive for agriculture and often unsuitable for
residential or commercial development. Thus, they have inherently low
property values, and usually generate far less tax revenue than
unmined sites. Far more insidious is that fact that corporate
officials looking to relocate companies in the anthracite region are
often deterred by the residual environmental destruction. As a
result, economic development within the region has seriously lagged
behind that of other areas of the country.
Clearly, a large-scale initiative is needed to restore abandoned
minelands. Since the problems took decades to create, they will not
be solved overnight. Nor will the solutions be cheap, because the
impact is dispersed over hundreds of square miles, and restoration
will involve moving millions of tons of materials to regrade culm
banks and fill stripping pits. Also, amending the soil to make it
suitable for plant growth, adding appropriate plant stock, and
restoring degraded stream channels will require enormous expenditures
in terms of manpower, equipment, and materials.
Restoring the anthracite fields must be done in a way that maximizes
the long term sustainability of the effort. In some cases, that will
require abandoning current approaches, and adopting smart
reclamation techniques that take the ultimate use of the site into
account. For example, a site that is likely to be reclaimed for
industrial development should not be treated the same way as a site
intended for open space. Smart reclamation techniques will require
thoughtful planning, ideally linking new Geographical Information
System technologies with careful analysis of in-field conditions.
The American Heritage River initiative and associated Anthracite Task
Force are ideal entities in which the current piecemeal approach can
be organized into a well conceived, integrated strategy for
successful, sustainable ecological reclamation. Clearly, no single
organization or governmental agency can heal the environmental
devastation caused by mining. Instead, an adequately funded, well
conceived, integrated effort involving federal and state agencies,
local scientists, the private sector, and existing and new non-profit
organizations must be initiated to really fix the problem for the
betterment of the region, the state, and the nation.